amroyounes:

Blame the algorithm

WHEN A BOOK GETS TOO EMOTIONAL

librarianproblems:

Can you lick the science? An abbreviated list.

rpepperpotshipssciencebros:

complaintificate:

tinysquidrachel:

swordwall:

small-home-repair-vikings:

spooky-son-of-rome:

carpebutts:

whisperwhisk:

seananmcguire:

snowysauropteryx:

Genetics: Do not. Unless cheek swabs?

Chemistry: NO!!!!! DO NOT!!!!!!

Archaeology: Perhaps. But might be human bone.

Geology: Sometimes needed, sometimes dangerous 

Psychology: Best not.

Physics: ????????? How??????

Zoology: In zoology, science licks you. 

Anthropology: Maybe ask first.

Herpetology: bad plan bad plan BAD PLAN

Sociology: Yes, if you have time and dedication and a willingness to piss a lot of people off.

Botany: You might hallucinate or die, OR it might be delicious

Computer Science: the tingle of electricity on your tongue is how you know it’s working

Epidemiology: FOR THE SAKE OF THE WORLD PLEASE DO NOT

Linguistics: Despite the name, please probably don’t.

Engineering: Maybe, but it’ll probably taste like spreadsheets 

Software engineering: nothing else has made the code work so you might as well try it

Neuroscience: that is someone’s brain. no. do not

Marine biology: you can try, but you’ll probably just get a mouthful of seawater

Library science: Sir, we already talked to you about this

Hematology: Only cool if you’re an actual vampire, otherwise no.

Bones: is there a word that’s a mix between ‘sad’ and ‘mad’?
Spock: malcontented, disgruntled, miserable, desolated.
Kirk: smad.

fun-ta-mental:

raverenn:

pr1nceshawn:

Reasons Why Retail Jobs are Harder than Office Jobs.

And yet people don’t think retail workers should get a living wage. I’ve literally gotten a five cent raise myself.

8 cent raise right here

Trying to write a chapter for a long abandoned fanfic be like

captainceranna:

“I have no memory of this plot”